New ‘EasyTrade’ service simplifies logistics for Trade Me sellers

Posted on Monday, May 7th, 2012

Press release, 7 May 2012, Tradevine and Brightstar NZ, Christchurch NZ:  For many sellers on Trade Me, storing, picking, packaging and dispatching orders is a time consuming and expensive part of their business. It’s a job that has to be done right as the remedial costs from mixing up an address, packing an item badly, or shipping the wrong product to the customer can far exceed the price of the goods shipped.

To help Trade Me sellers focus more on the essential parts of their business, such as buying, selling and marketing, Brightstar NZ and Tradevine have joined together to create a new and unique fulfilment service offering called “EasyTrade”.

Read the coverage in the National Business Review, Christchurch Press, NZ Herald, and Techday.

Read the press release.

Canterbury Scientific Invests in Breakthrough Pre-eclampsia Study

Posted on Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

New Zealand research could save the lives of mothers and babies around the world

Press release, 7 March 2012, Canterbury Scientific, Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury Scientific has embarked on a major study that could identify high risk pre-eclampsia patients early on in pregnancy and potentially improve the prognosis and survival rate for the 3% of women and unborn babies worldwide that develop the condition.

Read the coverage in the Christchurch Press and the Sunday Star Times.

Read the press release

Communicate IT Newsletter: December 2011

Posted on Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

Merry Christmas from Communicate IT

Ah the smell of pine, the opening of the advent calendar, the visits to Santa, and lazy hot summer days at the beach. Don’t you love Christmas?

Especially this Christmas. The last message we broadcasted was after the February earthquake. Since then we’ve been recovering, fixing, and adapting to the situation. It’s been both mentally challenging and disruptive, but we are surviving, and I’m pleased to say that thanks to our wonderful customers and referrers things are looking up for 2012. As our Avonside office was too damaged to work from, we (like many others) are now working remotely from our home offices and making use of online tools such as Dropbox and Skype. It’s working well, and the flexibility of accessing and sharing data anytime, anywhere is proving very handy.

We hope you enjoy this news update on some of our recent activities.  Please note that we’ll be closed between Christmas and New Years, and both Shannon and I will be back on deck from 4 January. Shelley will be holidaying in Golden Bay from 15-29 January, but checking emails regularly.  Have a very special holiday season and we look forward to seeing you in 2012!

Read the newsletter.

The Rise of Mobility

Posted on Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

The Canterbury Software Summit featured an impressive line-up of speakers this year.  It was held at Addington Raceway on 8 September, 2011. With nearly 500 registrations, the annual event surpassed everyone’s expectations as the largest event ever organised by the Canterbury Software Cluster, and the largest event of the Rutherford Innovation Showcase series.

The theme this year was “Can you compete in the international market” but equally it could have been “Can you compete in the mobile market”, for nearly every presentation touched on smart phones and mobile computing, and with good reason. In 2007, 87% of mobile consumers were not yet online, but just four years later that statistic is reversed.  And the message was clear:  if you’re not ready to serve your software to mobile devices, you’d better get ready – and quick.

Digital Wallets

Scott Bradley has clearly built his business on it – VoucherMob’s meteoric growth is attributed to the ability of smart mobile phones to transform the buying experience with location-based marketing.  Retailers like Pumpkin Patch, Bivouac Outdoor and Powerstore are able to engage with potential shoppers because of their ability to send communications like coupons or offers to the consumer when and where they are going to be most receptive to it, and to accept payment through the phone like a “digital wallet”.

Play

People are also using their phones to play games.  Commonwealth Bank’s Andy Lark talked about the importance of letting consumers “play” with your brand, and Tyone McAuley described how the traditional gaming industry is fundamentally changing.  People are seeking “bite-sized entertainment” anytime, anywhere – on the train, in a waiting room, within Facebook (with a nod to the success of Zynga’s Farmville).  This is greatly affecting traditional game development software houses like Sidhe.

Social Media

Lark told the audience that it’s imperative to design today’s software applications for mobile devices – because that’s where everything is going to happen, and if you don’t design your apps for it from the start, you’re going to struggle.  In fact, location should be used as a “lens” for the advent and design of new applications – like a mortgage application at Commonwealth Bank which allows you to walk up to a house to take a photo and record GPS coordinates, and then serves up any previous real estate listings and sale details, and finally allows you apply for a mortgage right there on the spot.  Mobile devices and social media are totally interconnected – 80% of Twitter usage is on mobile phones, and 40% for Facebook.  He told the story of a woman in a mall who tweeted that she’d lost her eftpos card, and was unhappy that she couldn’t shop – customer service saw it and arranged for a new card to be delivered immediately.  Now that’s service in the new mobile world.

Gestural

David Brebner suggested we are moving into the “post-PC” world, and that traditional web browsers are not the optimal way for people to interact with a computer and consume information.  Unlimited Realities’ touch or “gestural” software runs on a number of different hardware platforms.  ‘Fingertapps’ makes it easier and more intuitive for people to use their devices effectively – whether for games, shopping, or socialising.

Embracing Consumerisation

Leading corporate IT departments need to embrace the plethora of technologies out there, according to David Scott of Z Energy. He refers to it as “consumerisation” – business users bringing their smart phones, iPads and every other device under the sun to their IT manager and asking them to make it work on the secure, orderly corporate network.  And IT departments of today (or Business Technology departments as David calls them) need to embrace that change, because allowing business users to work on the devices of their choice makes them happier and more productive.

The Summit speakers provided lots of food for thought and got everyone thinking about how they can incorporate some of the ideas into their own business. And with the New Year fast approaching, this is the perfect time for us all to take a fresh look at our business strategy and consider how we too can capitalise on the bourgeoning mobile market.

To find out more you can download the presentations from the Canterbury software website at www.canterburysoftware.org.nz.

 

Canterbury Scientific Named Among Top 10 Hot Emerging Companies of 2011

Posted on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Press release, 31 October 2011, Canterbury Scientific, Christchurch, New Zealand:
Canterbury Scientific has been named in the Technology Investment Network (TIN)’s annual ranking of top performing technology companies in New Zealand, growing its revenue by 56% to $4.2m. It is ranked #165 on the list and is heralded by organisers as one of the top 10 ‘Hot Emerging Companies’ of 2011.

Read the coverage in the New Zealand Herald: “Technology exporters thrive in downturn” and “Wise heads at helm of emerging companies“, the National Business Review: “Southern tech company growing fast” and “New stars emerge as tech sector breaks $7b“, the Sunday Star Times: “High-tech sector beats the bank” and NZ Manufacturer: “Top performing company recognised“.

Read the press release.

So Many Messages, So Few Dollars

Posted on Thursday, January 21st, 2010

How to allocate a finite PR and Marketing Budget

There is a universal problem afflicting Marketing & Communications Departments worldwide. This issue applies equally to corporations the size of Coca-Cola and one-man bands operating out of the spare room. It is simple enough to define:

We have a finite amount of money to spend on marketing and promotion. What is the best way to allocate it?

Understandably, it’s hard to be sympathetic to Coca-Cola’s plight; they have to make do with a measly US$1.7 billion annual marketing budget1. So we’ll assume we’re talking about more down-to-earth figures.

Before you start spending money, it is vital to make sure you have a clear desired result, target audience and message (see our article Distilling the Message).

To get your message heard, you need to understand how your target group obtains information. There are industries, for example, in which the standard promotional mechanism is the trade show. For purposes of an ongoing presence, however, the two most common promotional methods are PR and advertising.

For some people, PR & marketing are synonymous with advertising. Yet branding does not always have a direct correlation to advertising. The clothing company Zara is the fastest growing retail chain in the world, and only runs two ads per year, focussing instead on public relations and word of mouth. Microsoft’s Xbox had such an effective advance PR programme that 75% of its target audience expressed an interest to buy before the company had ever run an ad.2

Every time your company is mentioned in an article, people are hearing about you and forming an opinion. Every time someone talks about your product to a friend or a colleague, they are affecting your public perception.

It’s important to understand what can and cannot be accomplished through the various promotional avenues. Let’s examine three characteristics of advertising and PR that are likely to impact how you decide to spend your time and money: credibility, certainty and cost.

Credibility

Information received from friends, acquaintances family members and colleagues has the highest amount of credibility. These people presumably have your best interests at heart and don’t stand to benefit from your purchase decision. This is known as Word of Mouth (WoM), and is the most credible form of promotion.

Next to WoM is editorial coverage, the kind generated by a good PR programme. In order for journalists to run with your press releases, attend your media launch events or agree to review your product, they have to be convinced of the story’s independent merit and newsworthiness. And because these people are seen as impartial, their messages are far more convincing than those coming directly from the company by way of advertising.

“Frequent mentions of IPOs by the media can help drive up interest from investors and have greater impact than official prospectus information on IPO prices.” Timothy Pollock, Ph.D, Penn State University

Certainty

Advertising is the most certain of the various promotional tactics. You pay for a specific spot, to be published or broadcast in a specific timeframe, and you have complete control over the look and content of the message. Advertising also allows for a precise level of repetition and consistency.

On the other hand, while you should be wary of any PR agency that guarantees coverage, a good PR person should be able to tell you when a story is newsworthy, and know which avenues to go down to maximise the editorial opportunities. Experienced PR professionals will also have established relationships with a variety of journalists, and will know what angle to take to make a news item more intriguing for a publication’s audience.

Cost

It can be tricky to make an apples-to-apples comparison of the cost of advertising vs. PR. Advertisements usually carry a high cost per impression – guaranteed exposure comes at a premium. The cost of design and production has to be added onto the cost of the ad space, and, in general, ads need to be run multiple times before they will be effective.

When PR is successful, however, the ‘bang for the buck’ tends to be significantly greater than that of advertising. You can potentially get more space than you would if you paid for it (articles can be two or more pages in length, and some TV news segments can go as long as two minutes). One press release or story can be run in as many outlets as are willing to cover it, as opposed to an ad which is limited to how many outlets you can afford.

A good PR campaign can be effectively complemented by strategically placed ads, particularly once the company has achieved a certain reputation. Once these umbrella tactics are laid out, other promotional avenues such as trade shows and direct marketing can be used to fill in the gaps as budget permits.

Every company will need to analyse its market context to make effective decisions on how to allocate the marketing and promotions budget. This comparison of the various techniques, however, can assist you to decide which strategy or combination of strategies is most likely to deliver your desired results.

Some Promotional Avenues

  • Advertising
  • PR (editorial, media launch events and releases, product reviews, feature tracking)
  • WoM Marketing
  • Expos
  • Roadshows
  • Direct Marketing
  • Viral Marketing

Sources

  1. Marakon Associates, Getting More from your Marketing Investments
  2. Al Ries, author, The Fall of Advertising & The Rise of PR
  3. Pollock, T.G. & Rindova, V.P., Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings

Measuring the Effectiveness of Your PR Programme

Posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Before you spend your valuable dollars on a PR programme, you need to determine exactly what you want to get out of it. Studies and statistics can demonstrate the value of PR as a discipline, but to measure meaningful results for your company, you must first define exactly what it is you’re hoping to achieve.

Well-executed PR has a definite and positive impact on a company’s bottom line. But it is important to track what your specific PR campaign is doing for your company. So how do you go about measuring the Return on Investment (ROI) of your PR dollars?

Clearly, it is easier to measure ROI for some investments than others. For example, a new machine costs $10,000 and produces $1,000 in profit per month: the machine will pay for itself in 10 months.

PR, on the other hand, is not as straightforward due to the intangible nature of such things like ‘attitude’, ‘reputation’, and ‘awareness’. The value of PR, though, is real, and has a direct impact on the success of the company. To implement and maintain an effective PR campaign, you need to understand exactly where this value is created.

We have found that businesses experience many benefits as a consequence of their PR activity:

  • Companies with favourable media coverage receive increased public interest, new business enquiries and referrals.
  • The business introduction and sales process can be shortened considerably, because when people read about businesses in the media they are perceived as market leaders and are more likely to be trusted.
  • PR reaches a wider audience and creates longer-term results than advertising.
  • Employees like seeing their efforts in print and reading about what their clients say of their work.
  • PR is good for recruitment, as people regard companies more favourably when they read about them in positive editorial of the business and technology pages.
  • Customers respond positively to joint case studies and the response they get when they are published in the media.
  • Students, applicants and customers around the world can also find PR generated coverage and news releases on the Internet. Those who are written about most are considered more dynamic.

Case Example – Holliday Group / iTouch
The Holliday Group employed Communicate IT at the beginning of 2000 for a sustained PR campaign with news releases and case studies to the media every month, plus regular tracking of relevant features that would be appearing in industry publications. The exercise has provided enormous value for us,” says Phil Holliday, Managing Director. “While we knew we were good, most others didn’t, but suddenly people started calling us. I remember getting a phone call from Dave (Ffowcs Williams) saying that he had experienced a ‘landmark change’. A freight company had called to say that they were looking for a wireless system and that they knew we were market leaders because they had read about us.” The increase in profile raised the perceived market and brand value of the Holliday Group and attracted many enquiries from the industry, some from people keen to buy the company. After months of negotiations, Holliday Group was acquired by iTouch PLC for a multi-million dollar figure in December 2000. While PR can’t take all the credit for their success, Holliday feel their average $2.5K per month spend on PR helped create significant return.

The nature of PR is that nonbiased third parties are speaking about your company of their own volition. The fact that there is an element of the message that is outside of the control of the campaign is precisely what gives media commentary such high credibility. Direct calls to action, however, tend to be best left to traditional advertising, where your company will have complete control over the content of the message.

The Value of PR as a Discipline

In 1999, the American Council of Public Relations Firms surveyed the hundreds of companies on the Fortune “Most Admired Company” rankings to determine if there was a pattern in their PR spending. The results of the survey were undeniable: the Council found that the more a company spent on PR as a percentage of company revenue, the better their reputation.

The survey also showed that the top 200 companies in the Fortune Reputation survey spent more than twice as much as the bottom 200. The findings confirmed that reputation can make a significant difference to the bottom line. While the top 10 ‘Most Admired Companies’ posted a return of 70.5%, the bottom 10 went down by 26.8%.

The report clearly proved that good reputation is directly correlated with strong financial performance.

Evaluating Media Coverage

While quantity and size of any coverage generated can give an indication to the success of the programme, this alone will not take into account the quality of the media or its relevance to your target audience.

Case Example – Bluewater Systems

Bluewater Systems began their PR campaign just under a year ago, and have received substantial trans-Tasman media coverage of their embedded computing solutions. Tim Trewinnard, the General Manager, describes the value Bluewater has received from an increased and improved public image:

“While Bluewater could not tie down new revenue directly related to an article published, there is an interesting correlation between the use of PR, a real increase in business revenue for the company and an observed increase in market recognition and respect. What we have observed in the market is that the Bluewater ‘brand’ has become increasingly recognised and on top of that, increasingly respected by potential customers. Companies are coming to us already understanding the work we do and of the mind set that we do it well. Typically they have all seen our name mentioned at some point in the past year, re-enforcing the fact that Bluewater has moved on from being a small ‘Fred in the shed’ developer to be a real company, doing real things for real customers.”

PR practitioners can provide a more subjective assessment by analysing the coverage, providing reader profiles of each key publication in which the coverage appeared and detailing how many executives with specific job functions have had opportunities to see the client name. The number of media interview opportunities identified, the status of journalists attending an event and quality of resulting coverage can also be used as the measurement criteria.

For most PR programmes it is valuable to maintain a press clipping service, as this will demonstrate the coverage your PR efforts have generated and, in turn, enable an accurate evaluation of the effectiveness of PR.

A further technique is to establish a message check protocol, which identifies key messages that need to be communicated in any given release. The release coverage is checked for key words.

These and other evaluation techniques provide useful indications as to whether or not the coverage can be considered successful. Over time, trends can start to be established. Such research can also enable you and your PR consultancy to know when to change and adapt both strategy and approach.

Determining the ROI of Your PR Campaign

To evaluate the ROI of your PR strategy cost-effectively, you must support and help monitor the programme with a professional and detailed sales conversion process. In this section we will demonstrate how you can support the PR evaluation process by measuring related activities.

To measure the effects of your PR programme, you need to determine the intended result before we begin. Different companies have different objectives for PR, and each objective has multiple variables that can be measured to determine the impact. Below are some examples of how specific objectives can be quantified. This list is by no means comprehensive, but will serve as a starting point to gauge the success of the campaign.

Increased Awareness

  • Hits on website
  • Sales enquiries
  • Phone calls
More Effective Recruitment

  • Enquiries from potential employees
  • Average length of time a position is open
  • Employee turnover
Increased Sales

  • Conversion rate of enquiries
  • How customer first heard of company
  • Which product or service is selling the most
Shorter Sales Cycle

  • Initial responses from potential customers
  • Length of time from first sales enquiry to deal close
Increased Investor Support

  • Share price
  • Volume of traded shares
  • Interest from potential investors
Lower Cost of Sales

  • Promotional costs as a % of sales
  • Cost to distribute message per thousand recipients

Depending on the size and structure of your organisation, some of these items will be easier to measure than others. Most small-to-medium companies, for example, have a ‘gut feel’ for the length of the sales cycle, but few track it with precision, making change difficult to measure unless it’s dramatic.

You can refer to the criterion you are measuring as the success variable. A quantifiable success variable allows you to evaluate results by knowing the starting value and the value after the PR campaign:

Item Example
Success variable Website hits
The starting value of that variable Before we began our PR campaign we got 3,000 hits per month
The value of that variable after the PR campaign After the media coverage of our new product the number went up to 5,000 hits per month.

Measuring website hits is a nice way to gauge interest because most people have ready access to precise figures. However, for that variable to be truly meaningful, you’ll have to go a step further and quantify the meaning of increased website hits. Do you know what percentage of people who visit your website enquire about your product? And what percentage of people who enquire eventually buy?

To get the best response from your PR efforts, therefore, you need to make sure that anyone interested in contacting you after reading a positive story will continue to have a positive experience. The usability of your website, the warmth of your company representatives, the professionalism of your marketing collateral, and the quality of your products and services are what will bridge the gap between interest and sales.

Notice that you must know the starting value of your success variable or you will have no way of knowing whether the end result is good or bad. To effectively measure the campaign, you have to ask good questions before you begin: What measurement information is in place? What is the variable that a) you are hoping to change and b) you are realistically able to track? And, most importantly, how will you follow up on increased exposure so that you can convert that publicity to dollars on your bottom line?

Finding the Right Angle – How to focus the story for the media and the audience

Posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

You’ve all heard it discussed before. What’s the angle? What makes your story unique? The angle is the lifeblood of every good journalist, and the ability to present the most intriguing facet of a given situation is what earns loyalty from a publication’s readers. In this article, we’ll take a look at angles and how to develop the most appropriate one for your story.

Angle is about audience

To develop a worthwhile angle, you must put yourself in the shoes of the target audience. Who are they? What problems do they face? Frame the presentation of the story in terms of a response to those questions.

In the case of a media release the first audience is the publication itself. What do they care about? They care about newsworthy, informative and factually correct stories that their readers will be interested in. If you are hoping to get media coverage for a story, you must answer the question, “Why is this story interesting to the readers?”

A story that takes the perspective of the reader will be far easier to sell to the media than one that takes the perspective of the company.

One of our clients, Bluewater Systems, is a provider of advanced embedded electronics solutions. If we’re proposing an article for a technical publication, we’ll focus on the technical angle. When we pitch stories about them to the mass media, though, we don’t mention bits or bytes; we talk about how a company like Bluewater can help entrepreneurs turn a vision into reality. With this angle, the story becomes relevant to everyone who has ever had a brilliant idea for a product.

Which brings us to another point: the angle is entirely subjective, and changes depending on the audience.

Angle is about results

It may sound cheeky, but a useful technique for figuring out the best angle is to repeatedly ask yourself, “So what?” You can also phrase it, “Why will this audience care?” You’ve added six widgets or switched technology from Acme to Megamart—what does that mean to the publication, the reader or the customer?

When we wrote the release about a Syft Technologies Voice100™ being installed at Christchurch Hospital, we asked ourselves those questions. Why would people care that a machine has been put in a room? We realised that the story isn’t about the technology, it’s about what that technology can do. The result was an angle that everyone cares about: saving lives.

Angle is about attention

The angle’s home is in the headline. The two-and-a-half seconds it takes people to read the headline is how long they will spend deciding whether the story is worth their attention. This handful of words is where the essential message gets conveyed, and the equation is simple: if people care about the angle, they’ll read the story. If they don’t, they won’t.

Remembering that your first audience is the publication itself, the equation becomes: if they think their readers will care about the angle, they’ll print the story. If they don’t, they won’t.

The rest of the text is there to back up the initial point. Elaborate on why this topic is even more significant than people think. Explain how your product or service solves the problem better than anyone else’s. And, towards the bottom, briefly describe the technology behind it.

It can be difficult to focus on the angle of a story. When you work closely with a technology, it becomes near and dear, and there’s a temptation to think everyone cares as much as you do about each wire and solenoid. If you can step back and put yourself in the reader’s shoes, though, you’ll be a lot more likely to achieve positive media coverage. With the right angle, people will understand why they should care.

The Truth about News ‘Exclusives’ – When to give them and why

Posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

The media can be fickle. One day they can’t spare a column inch for you, and the next they want all your stories and they don’t want anyone else to have them. Here’s a short primer on how to handle the sometimes desired, sometimes dreaded exclusive.

Weigh the story
The biggest thing about exclusives is the merit of the story. If you’re announcing that you just hired a new middle manager, send the story to all the migrations columns at the same time. If your story is likely to capture significant public interest, however, an exclusive might be appropriate.

Weigh the outlet
If you know you have a big story, aim high. Why not? In general, give the exclusive to the highest circulation media outlet that is likely to run with it. If, on the other hand, you think you’ll be doing well if the local paper picks it up, then perhaps it’s not worth the effort to bother with an exclusive. Come to think of it, in that case it might not be worth the effort to distribute the story at all.

Make a list of your preferred A-list media; for example you could start with television and move on to Sunday papers, national publications, daily newspapers, etc. When you have an exclusive start at the top of your list and work your way down.

What’s in it for you?
If you have an exclusive-worthy story, there are lots of benefits to keeping it that way. By giving an exclusive, you can get a bigger story with a higher calibre of publication or show than you otherwise might. The media are generally grateful for exclusives, and granting them fairly allows you to cultivate a positive relationship with them. Finally, if you are giving an exclusive and the journalist knows it, you are far more likely to be able to confirm whether or not you will get coverage. It is perfectly reasonable to say, “I’m holding the story for you, so please let me know if you’re planning to use it.”

How to handle them
As with most things in life, the best policy for exclusives is honesty. Discuss the nature of the exclusive with the reporter. If you’re only willing to hold it for a certain period of time, say so. If you talk to someone else about the story, be explicit about when it will be available to the rest of the media.

Timeframes
One of the indicators for the quality of an exclusive story is that it is quite time-sensitive – i.e. the media consider it to be “news” as opposed to something that could sit on the desk for a few weeks and fill a slot when they have one. Given that your story is time sensitive, e.g. a significant company announcement, a relevant response to a crisis or situation that is generating headlines, discovering or launching a breakthrough technology etc. you don’t want the media you are talking to holding up the process for long. If they can’t express a firm interest within a relatively short timeframe (i.e. two days at the most) then it is important to move on quickly to the next option. Failing a high level of interest from the key media, it is time to send out the release en masse.

If in doubt … always consult with your PR consultancy – we are happy to evaluate the story and discuss management options with you!

So Twitter’s great, but what am I supposed to do with it? – Getting to grips with Twitter

Posted on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Have you noticed that you are reading anything remotely connected to Twitter lately? Previously the domain of celebs, teenagers and hip consumer brands, businesses from every sector have jumped on the Twitter band wagon. Indeed, for marketing professionals around the globe it has become some what of a right of passage. No communications strategy is complete without a chapter dedicated to Twitter’s promised land.

And rightly so – as a communication channel it simply cannot be ignored. And this, for many businesses still hovering on the side lines or with one toe in the water, is part of the challenge – “I cannot ignore Twitter, but I have no real idea how to use it to its best advantage”.

Should I even be on Twitter?

First things first, Twitter is a communication channel and in principle can be analysed in the same way. The key difference, and beauty, of social media is that in contrast to traditional forms of media, the communication is real-time and truly two way, making it more powerful in every respect. So, when thinking about Twitter, consider:

• Who do I want to speak to?
• Are the people I want to talk to using Twitter?
• If so, what do I want to tell them?
• What would be interesting or useful to them?
• What do I want to learn from them?
• How will I measure the effectiveness?
• Do I want this information in the public domain?

There may be different answers to each question for each area of your business. By far the hardest starting point, and it is why many businesses dismiss Twitter or quickly become disenchanted, is beginning with the premise that you want to raise your company’s profile using Twitter. The aim is too broad for this type of medium and frequently results in off-putting company flag waving. Imagine monopolising a conversation with a colleague by telling them how fantastic you are, what exciting new thing you’ve just done and what your social calendar looks like. That colleague would certainly never progress to a friend and would be very likely to go and moan about you to 3 other people. On Twitter, you can magnify that situation by a 100 at the very least.

Instead, consider how different parts of your business could use Twitter. Product Development might want to build a community of analysts, journalists and technology partners to swap ideas and exchange information. Marketing may want to aid CRM programmes or User Forums by building more informal relationships with key customers to encourage better feedback.

How do I use Twitter for PR?

From a PR perspective, a great use of Twitter is to engage with it as your company press office. Some businesses choose to make this their default company Twitter, as it allows control over what corporate information enters into the public domain. Set up a Twitter specifically for your press office function, naming it as such, and use it as another distribution channel for press announcements, case studies or opinion articles. By following key journalists and analysts, you can circulate not just your own interesting, useful information, but hook into other industry news using tools such as Twitterfeed. Twitterfeed allows you to feed your Twitter account via self-selected RSS feeds, providing relevant, topical news. You can fine tune the feeds using key word searches, though be aware that as well as posting informative, news-led tweets, you could also be tweeting links to a controversial industry topic.

Tools such as Twitterfeed can also be used to feed company blogs through to Twitter, and clearly, there is much to be gained from this type of activity in terms of supporting web search engine optimisation and carving out a thought-leadership brand position.

Is it right for my business?

The trick for businesses, is to move away from the Twitter as “minute by minute update of what I’m doing”, through to “how can I use this medium to engage with my customers, influencers and prospects in a mutually useful way?”

But don’t forget the golden rule of any marketing communications activity – measure it! Twitter is free and powerful, but it costs your company time to use it effectively. Measure it in the same way you would measure any investment in any other communication channel. Set clear goals for what you want to achieve using Twitter – is it about learning? Encouraging customer referrals? Increasing traffic to the company web site? Lead generation? Building a market leading brand position?

If the people your business wants to talk to are out there on Twitter, use it. Just spend some time thinking about it first to avoid any tweet-haps.

Useful links

http://business.twitter.com/twitter101/ – an introduction for first time users
http://twitter.com/downloads – the world of Twitter applications to customise your Twitter experience
http://twitter.pbworks.com/Apps – more Twitter apps, good for advertising and analytics info
http://twitterfeed.com/ – how to tweet something useful without actually tweeting
http://tweetdeck.com/beta/ – organise your Twitter universe
http://tweetfeed.com/ – find what your most interested in from the tweeting world
http://tweetbots.com/ – manage multiple Twitter accounts, automate follow actions